However, the development of technology Felmer also for new players

The "Internet" is not a homogeneous mass, the endless stream of content, but collection of the various services. The different types of services often different rules should apply. Accordingly, the "Internet" is not considered "medium", at least not in the sense that the television and the press, yes.
The concept of media for a long time - despite the fact that one after another they came up with new forms - was not insecure content. The print media, television and radio could not be classified under the concept of media discussion. It is also not in dispute now that it does not consider the broadcast media, movies, books and handing out leaflets on the street either.
Earlier, the "traditional" approach defines la reodute the activities concerned on the basis of certain forms of media (appearance and distribution methods). The present stage of technical development, but this in itself does not provide sufficient guidance. The so-called. due to convergence (approx .: toe literally) the phenomenon of some of the content is no longer tied tightly la reodute release form the backing media: newspapers appearing in print can be read on the internet, mobile phone and watch the television show. The creation of new forms of communication (blogs, comments, personal websites, social media) la reodute is not classified in the previous (legal) categories.
Discussions in the public life, no matter how powerful, in this respect the role of the media, not forums exclusively provided by the media in one activity: a friendly group discussions with a pint of beer probably more effectively shape the participants in the debate's position as the evening television news programs. However, the media does not want to be a platform for all stakeholders in community discussions, much of the content of the media does not have - "public" relevance - in the traditional sense. Some authors la reodute define the concept of media propose a new functional approach in which the regulatory point of view only the individual or undertaking in respect of the media, who is collecting "information and ideas on public affairs and distributes a wide audience intended regularly and Acting defined standards for news gathering and editing process under. "
Commissioned by the European Commission's High Level Group Report also states that in order to effectively protect the rights of journalists and parallel obligations and responsibilities to be determined, la reodute must identify them. The Council of Europe's 2011 Recommendation definition of the concept calls for new media. The recommendation assumes that the media "new ecosystem" includes all new players who are content production la reodute and distribution process involved in a potentially large number of people forwarding the content (content aggregators, Application-makers, users who are content produced, provider of infrastructure management companies), provided that no editorial influence or supervise the content.
If according to the above question should be determined by the law to what constitutes the media, and possibly within also decide (general definition defined), that we belong to the "public affairs", for a public interest in disclosure of what information easily go awry definition, it is important media leaving out others unnecessarily involved in the scope of the concept. In any case, the enhancement la reodute of the professional nature of the media today is not only the theoretical question of media law: the Internet has transformed the extent of news consumption and earlier forms of the traditional (print and online also appears) the economic foundations of media has been compromised; A redefinition of the concept of media today primarily for professional journalists and media essential interests.
The High Level Group on Media Freedom and -pluralizmussal The Report also supports this when it stresses the importance of "the quality of resources," the importance of the media as a responsible and credible journalism defines "disposal".
It would make sense if the holders of the press, freedom of media owners would call it. They have the right to property is the basis of decision-making of business affairs, may apply and uninstall journalists, editors, media are free to set policy direction, it represents the cultural level. However, when we talk about freedom of the press, is usually not the first owner is the one who comes to mind when looking for the right holder. In the media, journalists, presenters and, indirectly, the editors communicate information, they are the ones who utter their voices, while the owner is typically remain silent.
However, the development of technology Felmer also for new players