Well, personally, I was not too nepozdava. If it etc. Agree to antitrust authorities so I am concer

All of the apple orchard and beyond.
Recently begin to proliferate speculation that Apple is preparing by buying a larger company. The aim of the last purchase of the company from Cupertino Lala was a small little firm dedicated to streaming music. However, the purchase price was only $ 17 million. vermont country store Lala had extra financial reserves in about $ 14 million, of which the last purchase Apple is doing financially almost insignificant expenditure of $ 3,000,000.
Maybe some of you will say, where Apple took so much money that he could afford to buy a company vermont country store like AMD, but the market price of the manufacturer of processors is less than $ 7 billion, Apple is not a problem. A company with nakousnutým apple emblem is financially on the rise since the return of Steve Jobs to the head of the company in 1996 and the last quarter show that Apple is one of the few companies which has almost touched the global financial crisis.
Today, however, appeared more interesting news. In the game to become the property of Apple and ARM company, a manufacturer of processors for nearly all current mobile phones and other portable devices. Its market value is about $ 8 billion, vermont country store which again does not constitute Apple so great expense.
The trouble with the possible purchase vermont country store of ARM is the same as in the case of AMD - would have to be like that institutions such as the Antitrust Authority. ARM processors are found in almost all the mobile phones of all manufacturers and buy Apple would the world of mobile phones vermont country store had a similar impact, as should the world of computers, if Apple bought Intel (which can not happen even in theory, the price of Intel is more than $ 130 billion ).
It is interesting that Apple, along with companies Acorn Computers and VLSI Technology ARM founded in 1990, and in 1996 he was forced due to financial problems of its own shares in ARM sell. Re-buy for ARM would thus mean a return under the wing of its own founder, who had more than recovered and is currently the third largest company in the USA (the other is Microsoft).
So how will all this end? If similar negotiations vermont country store with AMD or ARM actually take place, so i will need to wait to see if the competent authorities have approved vermont country store such acquisition and to whether this will eventually want to insert another big player such as Google. vermont country store
Steve Jobs, however, in case of purchase of more expensive ARM remains large enough pile of money to which he can work at the time of roll-style vermont country store duck curmudgeon vermont country store and invent new and revolutionary new device, which launches on the market.
Well I would say that if part of the agreement "nesplynutie" with Apple, and that the product vermont country store manufactured by the company will also be available to other companies (not as Mac OS X), and remains on a given relevant market competition, etc. (in case of AMD / ATI is not a problem - Intel, nVidia, VIA), I do not exactly like it is with ARM
- ARM is not the manufacturer of processors, just own patents on their architecture (and evolves them) - where appropriate take-over bid in the second one the company always exceeds the current market price (otherwise nobody would be tearing them to sell their share - at market price should it could get rid of more or less at any time through the stock exchange). If someone wants to take over the company must add motivational premium on the price. Of course needless we buy the whole company or a major proportion, just a significant vermont country store portion (that had sufficient influence on the Board) + pay can not only cash, but also own shares. vermont country store
Well, personally, I was not too nepozdava. If it etc. Agree to antitrust authorities so I am concerned that in spite of the fact that for ARM licenses represent all the proceeds would license Apple odstrihol and should all "in house".
And it would virtually cut off competition, actually all the producers Mobile users a variety of devices using ARM (onboard computer, for example., Printers, routers, set top boxes). In strategic terms, definitely a nice move, from the standpoint of common sense but nieco totally out. Competition is necessary and does not propose to ARM processors only, and only for the mobile market, but also quantum circuits supporting a specialized chip.
The problem is that ARM is not Intel or AMD, where you do everything yourself, vermont country store ARM has only the know-how to the ARM core and the production makes about 5 other big companies that buy up Apple fails. And if Apple just bought ARM and cut off from producer licensing, market quickly reacts and switches to other processors, compensation exist now. Further scandal threatens PowerPC, when Apple failed vermont country store to provide sufficient product sales with PowerPC and PowerPC consequently vermont country store began to lag died. Apple itself can not even with the best will sell a sufficient number reinforces and history vermont country store would repeat itself, Apple would necessarily have somehow processors deliver competition vermont country store and do not know whether he's shareholders approve
(8) is the largest company ExxonMobil. vermont country store It deals with the extraction of oil and natural gas producing motor oils and the like. They include, for example, well-known vermont country store brand of motor oil and Mobil1 around the world have nearly 40 petroleum refineries.
I hope that, in the interests of the Apple ARM regulator intervened ... in this case it would be probably better for the customer choice to be Samsung, which